Netanyahu Condemns Settler Violence: A Smokescreen for Annexation?
Mohammad Mansour
A wave of coordinated Israeli settler attacks on Palestinians in the West Bank over the weekend left dozens injured and property burned, while Israeli officials voiced condemnation without taking concrete action. Analysts say the verbal outrage is a calculated political move to mask ambitions of permanently annexing Palestinian land.
A wave of coordinated Israeli settler attacks swept through the occupied West Bank over the weekend, leaving dozens of Palestinians injured and property torched. The assaults drew little response from Israeli police and soldiers.
In the village of Qusra, south of Nablus, dozens of settlers attacked a Palestinian home with tear gas and stones, wounding seven people. A Palestinian Red Crescent ambulance trying to reach besieged families was also attacked. Around the same time, Israeli forces fired tear gas during raids on the Far'a, el-Bireh, and al-Mughayyir refugee camps. Soldiers also assaulted journalists in the old city of Hebron.
In Jalud village, a Palestinian family and a group of NBC reporters were assaulted. Meanwhile, in Arrabeh, two Palestinians were beaten near the Mevo Dotan settlement.
The Palestinian Foreign Ministry strongly condemned the escalation, particularly the 20-day siege of al-Mughayyir, calling it a policy of forced displacement and systematic colonial expansion.
Isolating to Protect the System
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu issued a statement strongly condemning "criminal acts of violence" in Qusra and Jalud, blaming a "small group of troublemakers" who break the law, hinder the military, and damage Israel's standing worldwide. He publicly stated his desire for law enforcement to "arrest the troublemakers and bring them to justice."
However, this public outrage contrasts starkly with the reality on the ground. Documentary footage shows masked settlers flooding into Qusra and Jalud in pickup trucks. Despite visual evidence and the prime minister's demands, Israeli police in the West Bank made no arrests.
President Isaac Herzog also weighed in, calling the events a "red line." The Israeli Foreign Ministry said the violence, carried out by "extremists," is entirely contrary to Israel's values. Opposition leader Yair Lapid called the violent weekend a "moral stain" and described the government's failure to address Israeli violence in the West Bank as a "national disgrace."
However, experts told Al Jazeera that the chorus of condemnation from Israeli officials is a calculated political move to shield the larger settlement project from international scrutiny. Ehab Jabareen, an analyst and Palestinian citizen of Israel, pointed out that Netanyahu is pursuing a "surgical political isolation"—separating overt acts of violence from the legitimized settlement system.
"He offers a political equation: there are 500,000 legitimate settlers, and a few deviants," Jabareen said. "He wants to punish, or create the illusion of punishing, the most blatant links to protect the larger system."
Security Concerns
Analysts argue that Netanyahu's statement is a pragmatic response to military concerns that unchecked attacks could ignite a major Palestinian uprising. Security assessments by Major General Avi Bluth, commander of the Israeli military's Central Command, warned that "nationalist crimes" could trigger a significant Palestinian reaction.
"The military speaks to Netanyahu in a cost-benefit language," Jabareen observed. "Dozens of settlers create an open front requiring the mobilization of thousands of soldiers. Netanyahu doesn't say this is unacceptable because it targets Palestinians; he says it hinders the military."
Mamoun Abu Amer, an analyst of Israeli politics, dismissed the notion that the state has lost control over settlers. He stressed that the military always protects settlers during attacks while heavily punishing Palestinians who defend themselves. "Settlers are too cowardly to carry out any attack without the sponsorship and protection of the government," Abu Amer said.
Planned Expansion
While Israeli officials publicly distance themselves from individual attacks, the government is systematically funding, legalizing, and expanding the settler presence. A Peace Now report shows that Israeli authorities have pushed settlement expansion since the 1993 Oslo Accords. Thirty years ago, there were about 110,000 settlers in the West Bank and 140,000 in East Jerusalem. Today, numbers have soared to 465,000 in the West Bank and 230,000 in East Jerusalem.
According to a 2025 European Union report, the Israeli government formally approved the establishment of 54 new settlements in just one year—a tenfold increase from the five approved in 2024. Concurrently, 86 new outposts were erected and 63,311 housing units were approved across the occupied territories.
Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who holds extensive administrative powers over the territory, declared a "revolution in settlement expansion," openly linking construction to preventing a Palestinian state. The government passed a record national budget of $271 billion, allocating 400 million shekels ($134 million) to the Settlement Ministry and National Missions, which officially authorizes illegal outposts.
This massive infrastructure investment includes pushing the strategic E1 settlement project, which could bisect the West Bank and erase any hope for a Palestinian state. The government just tendered 1,234 homes within a larger plan to build 3,401 units connecting the Ma'ale Adumim settlement to occupied East Jerusalem.
International Complicity
The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) has recorded over 1,540 settler attacks causing casualties or property damage to Palestinians this year alone, with monthly averages higher than any year on record.
Despite the historic surge in violence and land grabs, the Western response has largely been limited to verbal outrage. European countries and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) strongly condemned the settlement approvals, but analysts point to a clear inconsistency.
Abu Amer emphasized that Western nations have failed to impose meaningful economic sanctions on Israel, instead issuing travel bans against a few individual settlers. "There are political positions condemning the revival of the E1 project, but these positions have not translated into practical measures," he said.
He contrasted this hesitation with the swift action of 28 Western countries in cutting funding to the UN agency for Palestinian refugees based on unverified Israeli allegations. By separating the violent behavior of individual settlers from the state apparatus that arms, funds, and protects them, Israel continues to advance its strategic goal: the permanent and irreversible annexation of Palestinian land.